Blogs

Solving the mystery of the missing physics teachers

By Jasper Common posted 16-05-2023 16:21

  

Jasper Common and Dan Pledger - from STEM Learning's Monitoring & Evaluation Team - investigate the shortage of specialist physics teachers...

A challenge facing education is attracting physics specialists – teachers with degree-level physics qualifications. Physics was 79% below its target for attracting teachers in 2021/22 and 83% below in 2022/23 – making it the worst performing subject in this area.

Retention of physics teachers is also difficult - in 2020, the rate of physics teachers leaving their school was 14.3% - only Maths and Computer Science have a higher percentage.

Why does it matter whether physics is taught by somebody with a physics degree, if the curriculum content is the same? The subject knowledge of a teacher has been proven to impact student attainment - as cited in this paper from the University of Muenster, this journal article and this study published in the International Journal of Science Education - and if a student wants to stretch themselves beyond the curriculum, who better than a specialist to offer more complex content? Lacking access to a physics specialist may therefore have adverse effect on students’ attainment, which could in turn harm both their prospects in physics, and their belief that physics is “for them.”

However, access to physics specialists is not equal across school characteristics. NFER found that 57% of surveyed leaders from the highest levels of disadvantage said that at least some physics lessons were taught by non-specialists, compared to 38% in the lower lowest level of disadvantage (6). Using the School Workforce Census – a dataset on English teachers – we investigated whether differences in access to a physics specialist are also present regionally.

Figure 1 shows the proportion of schools in each local authority district (LAD) that employ a physics specialist:


Missing values represent suppressed data – where there were too few physics teachers or schools. There are some lighter areas with less access to specialists in the north, and some darker areas in the south, but any trends are made murky by the high number of LADs with around 40% - 80% of schools with a physics specialist.

To shed more light on possible trends, we grouped the LADs into quartiles – four categories with a roughly even number of LADs in each – based on the data before suppression, Figure 2 here:

A lower number indicates a quartile with fewer schools with a physics specialist. We can see that many of the dark red areas – districts with the lower proportions of schools with a physics specialist – are in the north of England.

This is supported by Figure 3, which shows the distribution of LADs in each region, compared to the overall percentage from non-suppressed data (the red line – roughly 65%):


Northern regions – the North East and West, and Yorkshire and the Humber – have the majority of their LADs below average. These regions often experience higher levels of disadvantage, so these findings reveal the complex interplay between location, disadvantage and access to specialists, illuminating another brick in the wall blocking social mobility.

STEM Learning have intensive courses to support you with becoming a physics specialist. Subsidies are also available to contribute towards the costs of travel and supply cover to help teachers participate in this CPD:

Physics for non-specialists

New to teaching A level physics

Data based on data from the School Workforce Census

8 comments
65 views

Permalink

Comments

14-06-2023 13:05

It would make an interesting comparison to see the situation in NI, Scotland and Wales, where education policy has been devolved.

08-06-2023 13:42

@Jacqueline Elton what an interesting question about the demographics of physics teachers! The Secure Workforce Data does have this information, and we'll absolutely consider adding this to our future research questions.

20-05-2023 16:01

What a great advert for SKE courses from Jacqueline.  If anyone would like to know more details of the Keele 'Goldstone Model' (we had some planning sessions at a certain location so hence the name) for physics or chemistry I am sure my ex-colleagues would not mind if I shared the course outline.  Just to expand on the backgrounds of some of our SKE students, we had Equine Studies, Forensics and Archaeology degrees along with many others.  These students brought something from their degrees to the teaching of physics and chemistry that certainly added to the 'pot' when in the classroom.

17-05-2023 21:34

Unsurprisingly the data shows a depressing picture which doesn’t seem to be getting any better despite various policy DfE attempts over the years to remedy the situation.   Perhaps more worryingly I’m sure that if we analysed the data further it would illuminate the underrepresentation of females and minority groups within the physics teaching body. Arguably though, the demographic composition of the physics teachers’ cohort should not be overlooked. Having physics teachers with characteristics that mirror the demographics of their classrooms more closely is presumably the first stage in engaging all students and creating an inclusive classroom culture from the outset even before the first bit of physics teaching has begun.  Do you have any data on this Jasper?  

As John says, teacher recruitment and retention are a current challenge regardless of the subject discipline so perhaps more creative upskilling and recruitment strategies are necessitated. I had a degree in Engineering, and I found that with some support my PCK was probably as good as that of my physics graduate colleagues, including up to A-level. It was my confidence that took the time to develop rather than my substantive knowledge. I was made to feel a bit second class!  I have another colleague who had to complete a Foundation degree in the natural sciences before he was permitted to enrol on teacher training – his PCK is as good as anyone else’s up to a certain level but then he doesn’t work in a school with a sixth form. Perhaps we should accept that there are niches where we can all be excellent physics teachers, but that not all physics teachers can be an A-Level teachers nor should we want or need everyone to be teaching at the elite /dizzy heights of A-Level or Triple Science GCSE Physics? What we can all agree on I assume are no unqualified teachers working in schools? 
Jacqui

17-05-2023 18:09

Thanks @Steve Castle - can see them all now :-)

17-05-2023 16:17

Thanks @Nigel Bowen - bit of a glitch there, images now included!

17-05-2023 16:13

This is not a new problem but your data certainly shows a deteriorating recruitment position, but if train drivers can earn £60K plus .......
At Keele University, in the early 2000's, we ran one of the first Physics Enhancement Programmes (PEP)(run by Dr Hazel Healey) and then the Subject Knowledge Enhancement programme,(SKE), the first looking to take those with physics related industrial experience, the latter with a wider remit taking those with science related degrees.  Both were two-year courses, subject knowledge development in Y1 and PGCE in Y2.  And this presents the problem as these courses are expensive both in terms of staffing and cost for the student, even with a bursary.  However, I feel that they are the only way that the pool of 'physics competent 'teachers can be increased.  In-service CPD can help but schools are reluctant to release staff.  On-line course can also help but after a day teaching, then some marking ,how effective is an on-line session in the evening?  The Keele SKE in particular was very successful in both getting people into schools confident in their subject knowledge and with a developed range of pedagogical strategies to use in the classroom.   Kevin Mattinson, Emeritus Professor of Education at BCU, has long been a supporter of SKE courses and is a source of practical managerial expertise in their development.

17-05-2023 10:36

"Figure 1 shows the proportion of schools in each local authority district (LAD) that employ a physics specialist" - sorry, I can't see Figure 1 shown in this blog post? Is there a link to it somewhere?